Which statement is true regarding NAT types?

Manual NAT indeed provides more flexibility than Automatic NAT because it allows network administrators to have explicit control over the translation process. With Manual NAT, users can define specific address mappings for individual devices or services, which enables customized setups that may not adhere to the default behavior or limitations present in Automatic NAT. This can be particularly useful in complex network environments where precise control is necessary, such as when dealing with static IPs for servers or specific services that require consistent addressing.

In contrast, Automatic NAT operates on a more general set of rules that can simplify the configuration for less complex scenarios. However, that simplicity comes at the cost of flexibility and control, making it less suited for environments requiring detailed configurations. Understanding these nuances helps administrators choose the appropriate NAT type based on their specific networking needs.